In tennis, not every match result is decided by a final point, a handshake after match point, and a completed scoreline. Sometimes a player cannot start, cannot continue, or is removed from the draw before the match is played. Two of the most commonly misunderstood terms in these situations are retired and walkover. Although both can result in one player advancing without winning a full match, they mean different things and carry different implications for players, tournaments, rankings, statistics, and bettors.
TLDR: A retirement happens after a match has started, when a player is unable or unwilling to continue. A walkover happens before a match begins, when one player cannot take the court and the opponent advances without playing. Retirements usually appear with a partial score, while walkovers generally do not have any completed game score. Understanding the difference helps explain official results, player records, and tournament progress more accurately.
What Does “Retired” Mean in Tennis?
A player retires from a tennis match when the match has already begun but cannot be completed because that player stops playing. This can happen at almost any stage: after a few games, after one set, deep into a deciding set, or even just before the opponent is about to serve for the match.
The most common reason for retirement is injury or physical illness. Tennis is physically demanding, involving sprinting, sudden changes of direction, stretching, serving, and repeated explosive movements. A pulled muscle, twisted ankle, shoulder injury, heat illness, cramping, dizziness, or worsening pre-existing condition may make it unsafe or impossible for a player to continue.
However, retirement is not limited only to visible injuries. A player may retire due to:
- Acute injury, such as a rolled ankle, back spasm, or muscle tear.
- Illness, including fever, stomach problems, dehydration, or heat-related symptoms.
- Severe cramping or exhaustion, particularly in long matches or extreme conditions.
- Worsening chronic conditions, such as shoulder, wrist, knee, or hip issues.
- Loss of ability to compete safely, even if the player could technically stand on court.
When a player retires, the opponent is declared the winner. The score is recorded up to the exact point where the match ended, followed by an abbreviation such as RET, ret., or “retired.” For example, a result might read: Player A defeated Player B 6-4, 2-1 ret. This means Player A won the first set 6-4, was leading 2-1 in the second set, and Player B retired before the match was completed.

What Does “Walkover” Mean in Tennis?
A walkover occurs when a match does not start because one player is unable to appear or is withdrawn before the first point is played. In this scenario, the opponent advances automatically to the next round without contesting the match.
The key difference is timing: a walkover happens before the match begins. If even one point has been played, the result cannot usually be considered a walkover; it becomes a retirement or another type of match conclusion depending on the circumstances.
Walkovers may happen for many reasons, including:
- Injury or illness before the match, often discovered or confirmed during warm-up, practice, or medical evaluation.
- Withdrawal from the tournament, where a player cannot continue in the event at all.
- Administrative reasons, such as a player being unable to meet tournament requirements.
- Scheduling or travel problems, especially in lower-level events, though professional tours have strict rules around this.
- Personal emergencies or exceptional circumstances accepted by tournament officials.
A walkover is usually listed as WO or w/o. A typical result might be shown as: Player A advanced by walkover against Player B. Unlike a retirement, there is normally no set score because the match never officially began.
The Central Difference: Did the Match Start?
The simplest way to distinguish between retired and walkover is to ask one question: Had the match started?
- If the answer is yes, and a player later stops, the result is generally a retirement.
- If the answer is no, and a player cannot take the court, the result is generally a walkover.
This distinction may seem technical, but it matters. Tennis records, ranking systems, player statistics, television graphics, tournament reporting, and betting settlements may all treat these outcomes differently. A completed match, a retirement, and a walkover are not interchangeable categories.
How Retirements Are Recorded
Retired matches are recorded with the score that existed at the time play stopped. The player who does not retire is credited with winning the match, while the retiring player receives a loss. The match is considered to have started and produced official match activity.
For example:
- 6-3, 4-6, 3-0 ret. means the match reached the third set before one player retired.
- 2-2 ret. means the match ended early in the first set.
- 7-6, 5-7, 6-6 ret. means the match was extremely close when retirement occurred.
In professional tennis, officials typically require a clear indication that the player is retiring. The chair umpire, tournament supervisor, medical staff, and player may all be involved depending on the situation. A medical timeout may come before a retirement, but taking a medical timeout does not automatically mean a player will retire.
It is also important to understand that retirement is not an admission of defeat in the ordinary competitive sense. A player may be leading comfortably and still retire because continuing would risk serious harm. Conversely, a player may retire when trailing heavily, which can lead observers to assume the match was effectively over. Officially, however, both situations are classified according to the same rule: the match started, and one player did not complete it.
How Walkovers Are Recorded
A walkover is normally recorded without a score because there were no completed games or points in the match. The player receiving the walkover advances in the draw, but the statistical treatment can differ from a normal win. In many official records, a walkover may not count as a match win in head-to-head statistics because the two players did not actually compete.
This can surprise casual fans. If Player A reaches the quarterfinal after Player B withdraws before their scheduled second-round match, Player A has advanced and remains in the tournament. But from a statistical perspective, that may not be counted the same way as a victory achieved on court.

Impact on Tournament Draws
Both retirements and walkovers affect tournament progression, but they do so at different moments.
With a retirement, the match was part of the day’s official play. Spectators may have watched a partial contest, broadcasters may have covered it, and the winning player had to spend energy competing before advancing. The player who wins by retirement may still experience physical and tactical demands, particularly if the retirement occurs late in the match.
With a walkover, the advancing player may receive an unexpected rest day. This can be a meaningful advantage, especially during congested tournaments where players are scheduled to compete on consecutive days. However, it can also disrupt rhythm. Some players prefer regular match play and may find it difficult to maintain sharpness after an unplanned break.
In knockout draws, the practical outcome is straightforward: the non-retiring player or the player receiving the walkover moves on. But the sporting context is different, and serious analysis should recognize that difference.
Impact on Rankings and Prize Money
Ranking points and prize money rules depend on the tournament level, governing body, and specific regulations. In general, a player who advances due to an opponent’s retirement or walkover may continue earning points and prize money according to the round reached. The withdrawing or retiring player may also receive points and prize money based on how far they had progressed before the incident.
However, professional tours often have detailed rules to discourage abuse. For example, there may be regulations around late withdrawals, fitness to play, lucky losers, and participation in subsequent events. A player cannot simply enter tournaments, fail to compete, and expect no consequences. Medical documentation or supervisor approval may be relevant in certain cases.
At amateur and recreational levels, ranking systems vary widely. Local leagues, clubs, and junior circuits may use their own rules. Some may treat a retirement as a completed win for the opponent, while a walkover may carry penalties for the player who failed to appear. Others may distinguish between excused and unexcused walkovers.
Retired vs Walkover in Betting Markets
The difference between a retirement and a walkover is particularly important in betting, because sportsbooks may apply different settlement rules. This is an area where assumptions can be costly.
Some bookmakers require at least one point to be played for match bets to stand. Others require one set to be completed. Some may settle the winner if the match starts and one player retires, while others void certain markets. Set betting, total games, handicap games, and live bets may each have separate rules.
A walkover often results in bets being voided because the match never started. But this is not universal in every market or jurisdiction. Anyone placing wagers should read the specific bookmaker’s tennis rules rather than relying on general knowledge. The official tournament result and the betting settlement are related but not always identical.
Common Misunderstandings
One common misunderstanding is that a walkover is the same as a retirement. It is not. The dividing line is whether play began. Another misunderstanding is that a player who retires must have been losing. In reality, players can retire while leading, tied, or trailing.
A third misconception is that a walkover is always suspicious or unprofessional. In fact, walkovers are often medically responsible decisions. If a player is injured or ill before taking the court, withdrawing may protect both the player and the integrity of the competition. Starting a match merely to retire after one game is not necessarily better for the sport.

Other Related Terms
To understand match results properly, it helps to distinguish retired and walkover from other tennis terms:
- Default: A player is removed from a match or tournament due to a rules violation, misconduct, or code violation. This is different from a medical retirement.
- Withdrawal: A player pulls out of a tournament or match before playing. A withdrawal can lead to a walkover if it occurs after the draw has been made and an opponent is scheduled.
- Lucky loser: In some tournaments, a player who lost in qualifying may enter the main draw when another player withdraws before the first-round match begins.
- No contest or abandoned match: Rare situations involving external conditions, administrative decisions, or exceptional circumstances may be handled under specific rules.
Why the Distinction Matters
For fans, the distinction between retired and walkover improves understanding of what actually happened. A final scoreline with “ret.” tells a different story from “w/o.” One indicates a match began and ended prematurely; the other indicates the match never took place.
For players, the difference affects workload, recovery, reputation, and sometimes eligibility for future rounds or events. For analysts, it affects form assessment. Defeating an opponent over three completed sets is not the same as advancing by walkover, and winning when an opponent retires after two games provides limited evidence about performance.
For tournament organizers, accurate classification supports fairness and transparency. For statisticians, it preserves the integrity of records. For media and fans, it prevents misleading narratives.
Conclusion
Retired and walkover are both official ways a tennis match can end or fail to begin, but they describe different circumstances. A retirement occurs after the match has started and is recorded with the partial score. A walkover occurs before the first point is played and usually has no scoreline.
The practical result may look similar because one player advances, but the meaning is not the same. A retirement reflects an unfinished contest; a walkover reflects an unplayed match. Understanding that distinction allows fans, players, coaches, analysts, and bettors to read tennis results with greater accuracy and fairness.



